<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should we support IE 6?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heavychef.com/should-we-support-ie-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heavychef.com/should-we-support-ie-6/</link>
	<description>Practical Learning About Digital Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:11:42 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.heavychef.com/should-we-support-ie-6/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heavychef.com/?p=667#comment-455</guid>
		<description>My feeling is that there are levels of &quot;support&quot; that you can give to IE6, ranging from totalling ignoring it, to making sure every pixel looks the same as in Firefox or IE7. I don&#039;t think either of those extremes are right. It is worth checking your sites in every conceivable browser and confirming that it is at least functional (ie the &quot;Add to cart&quot; button displays and is clickable), but you might be wasting your time agonising over the design for IE6 users - you&#039;ll find that they have the highest proportion of 800x600 screen resolutions, and probably wouldn&#039;t notice your misplaced pixel if you pointed it out to them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feeling is that there are levels of &#8220;support&#8221; that you can give to IE6, ranging from totalling ignoring it, to making sure every pixel looks the same as in Firefox or IE7. I don&#8217;t think either of those extremes are right. It is worth checking your sites in every conceivable browser and confirming that it is at least functional (ie the &#8220;Add to cart&#8221; button displays and is clickable), but you might be wasting your time agonising over the design for IE6 users &#8211; you&#8217;ll find that they have the highest proportion of 800&#215;600 screen resolutions, and probably wouldn&#8217;t notice your misplaced pixel if you pointed it out to them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

